Building a Learning Culture That Embraces New Technology


Every L&D professional has had this experience: you design and deliver excellent training on a new technology. Participants engage, learn the material, and give positive feedback. Then they go back to work and nothing changes.

The problem isn’t the training. It’s the culture.

If your organisation’s culture doesn’t support continuous learning and adaptation, even the best programs will fail. Conversely, in a strong learning culture, people adopt new technologies with minimal formal intervention.

This means the highest-leverage investment isn’t better training programs. It’s building a culture where learning and adaptation are normal.

What Learning Culture Actually Looks Like

“Learning culture” is one of those corporate phrases that gets thrown around without clear definition. Let me be specific about what I mean.

In a genuine learning culture:

Learning is expected, not exceptional. Continuous skill development isn’t something extra people do when they have time. It’s a fundamental part of everyone’s role. Harvard Business Review research shows organisations with strong learning cultures significantly outperform peers in adapting to technological change.

Experimentation is safe. People try new approaches without fear of punishment for failure. Mistakes are learning opportunities, not career risks.

Knowledge flows freely. Information and skills aren’t hoarded. People share what they know and learn from each other.

Curiosity is valued. Asking questions is encouraged. “I don’t know” is an acceptable answer that leads to finding out.

Development is supported. The organisation provides time, resources, and encouragement for learning—not just lip service.

Why Culture Trumps Training

Training programs operate within the cultural environment. That environment determines whether training sticks.

In a weak learning culture:

  • People attend training because they’re required to
  • New skills compete with “real work” for time and attention
  • Managers don’t reinforce what was learned
  • There’s no peer support for applying new methods
  • The path of least resistance is doing things the old way

Even excellent training can’t overcome these forces.

In a strong learning culture:

  • People seek out development opportunities
  • Applying new skills is integrated into regular work
  • Managers actively support capability building
  • Colleagues share tips and problem-solve together
  • The path of least resistance is continuous improvement

In this environment, formal training amplifies existing tendencies. It doesn’t have to create them from scratch.

The Elements of Learning Culture

Building learning culture requires attention to multiple reinforcing elements.

Leadership Behaviour

Culture flows from the top. If senior leaders don’t visibly prioritise learning, no one else will either.

Leadership behaviours that signal learning culture:

  • Leaders participate in development activities themselves
  • They talk about their own learning, including struggles
  • They allocate time and budget for development
  • They ask about learning in regular conversations
  • They celebrate learning achievements, not just results

Behaviours that undermine learning culture:

  • Leaders exempt themselves from development expectations
  • Learning is treated as a cost to be minimised
  • Development time is the first thing cut under pressure
  • Failure is punished, even when learning occurred
  • “We’ve always done it this way” goes unchallenged

Manager Capability

Middle managers are the linchpin. They determine whether organisational intentions become team reality.

Managers need to:

  • Understand their role in developing their teams
  • Have time allocated for coaching and support
  • Be evaluated partly on team development
  • Model learning behaviour themselves
  • Create psychological safety for experimentation

Most organisations don’t explicitly develop managers for this role. They assume management skill automatically includes development capability. It doesn’t.

Systems and Processes

Culture lives in systems as much as values statements. Look at what your processes actually encourage:

Performance management: Does it assess and reward learning, or just results? People optimise for what they’re measured on.

Time allocation: Is learning time protected or constantly deprioritised? What gets scheduled gets done.

Career progression: Do advancement criteria include capability development? Or can you get promoted without growing?

Resource access: Are learning resources readily available? Or do people have to jump through hoops?

Mistake handling: What actually happens when someone tries something new and it doesn’t work? The answer to this question shapes behaviour more than any policy.

Physical and Digital Environment

Environment shapes behaviour. Consider:

Collaboration spaces: Are there places for informal learning and knowledge sharing?

Tool access: Can people easily try new technologies? Or is there bureaucratic friction?

Information architecture: Is knowledge findable and accessible? Or locked in silos?

Communication channels: Are there forums for learning conversation? Or just task-focused communication?

Building Learning Culture Step by Step

Culture doesn’t change through announcements. It changes through consistent action over time.

Phase 1: Assess Current State

Before trying to change culture, understand it. Assessment methods include:

  • Employee surveys on learning climate
  • Focus groups to explore perceptions
  • Observation of actual behaviours and norms
  • Analysis of existing systems and processes
  • Benchmarking against high-performing organisations

Be honest about what you find. Most organisations overestimate their learning culture.

Phase 2: Secure Leadership Commitment

Culture change requires sustained leadership attention. Before proceeding, ensure:

  • Senior leaders understand why culture matters
  • They’re willing to model expected behaviours
  • Resources will be allocated over the long term
  • Learning culture is connected to strategic priorities

Without genuine leadership commitment, initiatives become theater.

Phase 3: Start with High-Impact Changes

Identify changes that are visible, achievable, and signal a shift. Examples:

  • Protect dedicated learning time on calendars
  • Share stories of learning and adaptation publicly
  • Adjust performance criteria to include development
  • Remove barriers that make experimentation difficult
  • Celebrate people who model learning behaviour

Quick wins build momentum for harder changes.

Phase 4: Develop Manager Capability

Invest heavily in helping managers become development enablers. This means:

  • Training on coaching and feedback
  • Tools and frameworks for development conversations
  • Clear expectations about their role
  • Support when they encounter challenges
  • Accountability for team development outcomes

This is often the most important and most neglected lever.

Phase 5: Align Systems

Systematically review and adjust processes that affect learning behaviour:

  • Performance management
  • Career frameworks
  • Resource allocation
  • Recognition programs
  • Communication practices

Misaligned systems will undermine cultural intentions.

Phase 6: Sustain and Iterate

Culture change takes years, not months. Plan for:

  • Regular assessment of progress
  • Adjustment based on what’s working and what isn’t
  • Continued leadership attention and modelling
  • Integration of new employees into the culture
  • Renewal as the organisation evolves

The Technology Connection

When learning culture is strong, technology adoption becomes much easier.

People in strong learning cultures:

  • Are already comfortable with change and experimentation
  • Have support structures for developing new skills
  • Expect to continuously evolve their capabilities
  • See new technology as opportunity, not threat

You still need good training, clear communication, and change management. But you’re building on a solid foundation rather than fighting against cultural resistance.

The Investment Case

Building learning culture requires sustained investment. Is it worth it?

Consider:

  • Every future technology change becomes easier to navigate
  • Retention improves because development opportunities matter to employees
  • Performance improves as capabilities grow
  • Innovation increases when experimentation is safe
  • Recruiting improves because strong cultures attract talent

You can’t directly calculate the ROI of culture. But organisations with strong learning cultures consistently outperform those without.

Honest Limitations

I should be honest about the challenges:

Culture change is slow. If you need AI adoption next quarter, building learning culture won’t help. It’s a long-term investment.

It requires sustained attention. Cultures drift back to default patterns without continuous reinforcement.

Not everyone will adapt. Some people aren’t suited for learning-intensive environments. That creates difficult personnel decisions.

It’s easy to fake. Organisations often claim learning culture while their systems and behaviours say otherwise. Self-deception is common.

Building genuine learning culture is hard work over extended time. There are no shortcuts.

The Bottom Line

Training programs matter. But they operate within a cultural context that determines their impact.

If your organisation struggles to adopt new technologies, the problem might not be training. It might be culture. Investing in culture is harder and slower than investing in training programs. But it’s often more valuable.

The organisations that will thrive through continuous technological change aren’t those with the best training programs. They’re those with cultures where learning and adaptation are simply how things work.

That’s the real foundation for technology adoption. Everything else is built on top of it.